Asus AM1M-A/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 22:56
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 2650 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Memory 15.8
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 39.7
14% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 40.2
8-Core 39.9
5% 40.1 Pts
64-Core 33.2
2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2
0% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 51 69 68 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 50.1
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 58.7
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TLD34G16S10 99U5584-007.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 326
12% 326 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC056 Philips 221EL
Typical AM1M-A/BR Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback