Lenovo 30H0000XUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30H0000XUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3333
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 22:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 202
2-Core 400
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 795
8-Core 1,372
131% 1,084 Pts
64-Core 2,485
154% 2,485 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 3333) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5187
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 11.6
9% 12.7 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X102N 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,545
Write 3,346
Mixed 2,466
763% 3,452 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 109
355% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,624
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,384
1,042% 1,404 MB/s
Poor: 190% Great: 462%
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1001 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 73116101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,369
Write 3,353
Mixed 2335
672% 3,019 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 93.3
337% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1835
DQ Write 1712
DQ Mixed 1,575
1,237% 1,707 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 476%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 63.9
MC Write 60
MC Mixed 57.8
173% 60.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 29.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24B2W1
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback