MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 21:47
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 98.2
1-Core 197
2-Core 401
123% 232 Pts
4-Core 799
8-Core 1,533
138% 1166 Pts
64-Core 1,882
116% 1,882 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Asus(1043 88E6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5990 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 527
Parallax 682
97% 443 fps
MRender 458
Gravity 517
Splatting 265
324% 413 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 160%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3832 2929 1103 1390 1415 1391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,670
Write 3,988
Mixed 2,856
SusWrite 2010
652% 2,881 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 78.3
249% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,097
DQ Write 1303
DQ Mixed 1,890
1,357% 1,763 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 383%
Great: 604%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
839GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3304 3245 1880 2982 1482 1381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,652
Write 3,649
Mixed 2,853
SusWrite 2,379
652% 2,883 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 78.8
244% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 2,059
DQ Write 1,458
DQ Mixed 1,949
1,404% 1,822 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 406%
Great: 614%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
717GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3588 2719 2323 2304 1825 1758 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2,738
Write 3,516
Mixed 2831
SusWrite 2,420
650% 2,876 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 76.4
251% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 2,051
DQ Write 1,604
DQ Mixed 1,849
1,378% 1,835 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 416%
Great: 614%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1145 1126 1119 1130 1124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1310
Write 1089
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 1131
260% 1,157 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 65.5
213% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,552
DQ Write 1,269
DQ Mixed 1,681
1,185% 1,501 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 250%
Great: 431%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
243GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 488 480 477 481 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 485
Mixed 407
SusWrite 482
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 54.8
184% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
HP S700 Pro 1TB
947GB free
Firmware: R0201B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 440 434 431 435 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 437
Mixed 355
SusWrite 435
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 37.6
133% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 278
227% 322 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C32-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
205% Outstanding
MC Read 86
MC Write 67.5
MC Mixed 72.5
215% 75.3 GB/s
SC Read 57.4
SC Write 60.2
SC Mixed 63
172% 60.2 GB/s
Latency 47.6
84% 47.6 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 205%
Great: 222%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 31 120 26.7" 1280 720 AUS27FD PG27AQDM
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback