MSI MS-17L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF76 11SC
MotherboardMSI MS-17L2  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220624
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 21:13
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 254
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 621
66% 529 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
MSI(1462 12EB) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 42
42% 54.6 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 44
Splatting 43.5
40% 50.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G-1032 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1255 1208 72 45 57 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,274
Mixed 1,276
SusWrite 447
254% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 84.2
309% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 653
531% 746 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 220%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 17.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 144 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO978F
Typical MS-17L2 Builds (Compare 2,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback