HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A3D
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 21:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 78.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 273
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 700
75% 598 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8A3D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.02.07
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 27.4
16% 22 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-000H1 1TB
501GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,390
Write 1332
Mixed 1239
295% 1,320 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 49.8
163% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 792
591% 791 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GSOH22F-28---------- 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 29.3
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 19 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO2992
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback