Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121114
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 20:46
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 129
56% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 357
37% 298 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 69
Parallax 102
60% 81.2 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 84.5
Splatting 53.7
55% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 51 46 45 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 67
Write 64.2
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 42.2
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 1TB
513GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 91 93 92 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 94.7
Write 95.8
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 91.9
114% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64C0MHHHJ-HS 64C0MHHHJ-HS 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 26% 38 204 54 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3577 HP 24m
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback