Lenovo 82JU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82JU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 20:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 71.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 794
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 120
Parallax 113
96% 117 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 92.3
Splatting 83.3
82% 103 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X084N 512GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41010C22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1067 998 964 953 944 918 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2484
Write 2,080
Mixed 1,624
SusWrite 974
400% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 73.3
234% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 817
612% 822 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 269%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MF96HAF-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 26.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 25.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 15.5" 1280 720 AUOB69B
Typical 82JU Builds (Compare 5,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 82JU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback