Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive474% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory50.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 19:39
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 168
2-Core 331
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,316
118% 994 Pts
64-Core 2,720
168% 2,720 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
PNY(196E 138B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.52
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 137
Parallax 130
117% 137 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 156
Splatting 112
132% 169 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 118%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4109 3944 4511 4662 3026 3661 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
474% Outstanding
Read 1,824
Write 4,336
Mixed 2,444
SusWrite 3,985
719% 3,147 MB/s
4K Read 72.9
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 107
352% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 1,090
809% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 282%
This bench: 474%
Great: 630%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
214GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 417 303 403 412 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 453
Mixed 420
SusWrite 384
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48
177% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Wl3000gsa6472e 1 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 133 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 127
Write 142
Mixed 73
SusWrite 134
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75%
Great: 93%
WD WD8001FFWX-68J1UN0 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 95 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 97.8
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 43.2
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.9
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 131%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 4R 1G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 8 139 59 144 24" 1920 1080 AUS24A3 MG248
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback