HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AD
Memory15.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 19:36
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 450
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
HP(103C 87AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 47.4
40% 49.7 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 41.9
40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 87AD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 286 55 73 74 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,156
Write 818
Mixed 759
SusWrite 104
157% 709 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 46.1
154% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 218
210% 328 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 118%
Great: 203%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1TB
361GB free
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 361 280 172 54 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 398
Write 314
Mixed 382
SusWrite 205
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 27.5
92% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 257
201% 277 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 20.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback