Casper NIRVANA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCASPER CASPER NIRVANA
MotherboardCasper NIRVANA  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 19:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 507
58% 450 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2267 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 74.7
60% 76.3 fps
MRender 76.5
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 72.5
61% 74.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 105 121 111 111 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 502
Write 453
Mixed 388
SusWrite 119
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 15.3
96% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 120
150% 265 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
371GB free, PID a009
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 42.1
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 42
50% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hi-Level 04CD F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC0AC 227E4LH
Typical NIRVANA Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Casper NIRVANA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback