Asus ROG Strix G733PZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Strix G733PZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G733PZ
Memory49.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 19:18
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 196
2-Core 390
113% 219 Pts
4-Core 717
8-Core 1,466
128% 1,091 Pts
64-Core 3,294
204% 3,294 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Asus(1043 230D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 13.2
6% 11.8 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 8
Splatting 21.9
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$321
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2378 2341 2330 2430 2434 2419 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 2,474
Mixed 2279
SusWrite 2,388
500% 2,197 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 71.3
233% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 929
663% 871 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 322%
Great: 616%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$321
3TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 2359 2375 2364 2332 2365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,254
Write 2,492
Mixed 2,304
SusWrite 2,338
530% 2,347 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 69.8
221% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 808
596% 809 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 338%
Great: 616%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 35.4
Mixed 38
SusWrite 21.7
8% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 15.7
55% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 30.7
DQ Mixed 31.3
24% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 78%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 1TB
953GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 54.4
Write 34
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 20
45% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 12.5
934% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,369% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SD5-4800 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 52.5
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 43.5
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 45.9
SC Write 55.6
SC Mixed 46.1
141% 49.2 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 133%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 17.2" 1707 889 BOE0B69 NE173QHM-NZ2
Typical ROG Strix G733PZ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Asus ROG Strix G733PZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 211% - Outstanding Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback