Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 71
2-Core 154
50% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 472
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 19.4
12% 17.6 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 14.2
14% 17 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 796
Write 757
Mixed 771
173% 775 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 9.5
90% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 433
300% 380 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 22.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO05A7
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_X1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback