Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime51.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 17:27
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 142
2-Core 273
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 1,004
92% 772 Pts
64-Core 2113
131% 2113 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 168
Parallax 171
141% 170 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 131
Splatting 116
112% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1615 1221 1016 882 769 553 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,634
Write 2,322
Mixed 1,870
SusWrite 1,009
438% 1,959 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 90.1
303% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 1,059
787% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 410%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
15GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 114 99 87 76 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 435
Write 134
Mixed 195
SusWrite 96.1
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 32.2
119% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 129
108% 159 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
192GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 79 77 80 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 71.7
Write 75.6
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 77.7
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
436GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 156 156 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 153
Write 124
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 158
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KHX2666C15D4/8G Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 24.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 1R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 31% 16 217 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB7 LG IPS FULLHD
History: Score 9: 0P 1R 0G 4B | Score 30: 0P 1R 6G 7B
Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback