Asrock B660M Pro RS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B660M Pro RS  (all builds)
Memory16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220117
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 16:56
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 158
2-Core 294
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 966
89% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 85%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 111
94% 112 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 92.3
Splatting 82.3
80% 99.6 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 1TB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1370 508 358 356 356 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1821
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,750
SusWrite 565
341% 1,517 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.3
226% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 870
656% 883 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 217%
Great: 305%
Nvme KIOXIA-EXCERIA SSD 500GB
167GB free
Firmware: ECFA12.b Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1533 1173 774 781 772 696 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,094
Write 1392
Mixed 1,172
SusWrite 955
261% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 54.6
200% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,133
857% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 215%
Great: 248%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 156 154 155 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 123
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 155
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
395GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 167 162 162 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 108
Write 155
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 158
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3600 C18 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 29.5
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 180 27" 1280 720 ACR0BDC XV271U M3
Typical B660M Pro RS Builds (Compare 3,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B660M Pro RS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback