TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Monster TULPAR T7 V21.8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V21.8  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V21.8
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 319
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,120
105% 875 Pts
64-Core 1,292
80% 1,292 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 94.6%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1147) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5445
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 11.5
8% 12.7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 6.61%
 Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1147) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 164
Parallax 149
130% 157 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 116
Splatting 112
108% 136 fps
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1934 1950 1941 1947 1888 1906 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,758
Write 3229
Mixed 2,446
SusWrite 1,928
584% 2,590 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 65.5
242% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 988
762% 1046 MB/s
Poor: 225% ↑
This bench: 350%
 Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 32.9
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 18.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 96.7%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 17.2" 2560 1369 BOE0977
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TULPAR T7 V21.8 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V21.8

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples332x
GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples193x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples139x
SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples89x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples80x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial  $99Bench 200%, 52,084 samples38x
RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples56x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples38x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 2,776 samples28x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback