MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 921
102% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 115
Parallax 140
98% 125 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 114
Splatting 107
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 427 422 412 341 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 467
Mixed 402
SusWrite 382
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58.2
194% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 156
177% 301 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
109GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 94 95 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 86
Write 80.7
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 93.4
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 183 184 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 126
Write 157
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 181
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.8
230% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
495GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 107 109 109 108 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 53.8
Write 82.8
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 106
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
711GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 16 15 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 26.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 SNY9502 SONY TV
Typical B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 8,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback