Asrock H87 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 13:28
Run Duration	104 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 203 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 539 58% 459 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Lighting 56 Reflection 37.2 Parallax 69.9 46% 54.4 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 54.4 Splatting 45.9 37% 45.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3363 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1088 (B1) Unknown 96 96 37 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 114 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8048724226	93.6% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 343 Mixed 338 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 23 140% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 65.6 109% 215 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 842GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 171 2358 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2205 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3392 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1076 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2114 (C2) HDA temperature 117 105 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	96.6% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 170 Mixed 163 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.34 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.36 145% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 44,086 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 19.6 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 19.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Pro4 - $113

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	90x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	49x
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	37x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	34x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	19x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	29x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $413

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16