Pcspecialist Recoil VIII 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 296%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPcspecialist Recoil VIII 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7IX7N
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240409
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 15:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 228
2-Core 447
129% 251 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1,629
144% 1,224 Pts
64-Core 3,416
211% 3,416 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
CLim: 3210 MHz, MLim: 5500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 307
Parallax 351
231% 314 fps
MRender 392
Gravity 267
Splatting 211
228% 290 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 204%
Great: 235%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2518 2592 2624 2630 2528 2499 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,224
Write 2,522
Mixed 2,137
SusWrite 2,565
534% 2362 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 74.7
239% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,620
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 1,169
842% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 368%
Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5X16G1A48C40A2-PC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 62.8
MC Write 60.8
MC Mixed 57.5
172% 60.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 48.3
SC Mixed 27.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 155%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 1R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 12% 57 216 58 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F3F ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical Recoil VIII 17 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 291%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Recoil VIII 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 130% - Outstanding Total price: $121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback