Hansung GTS73 N9X9U14

Performance Results


Gaming 209% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 218% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	229% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	391% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Hansung GTS73 N9X9U14 (all builds)
Motherboard	HANSUNG X370SNW-G
Memory	50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230428
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	May 09 '24 at 15:39
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13900HX 8,895 User benchmarks, average bench 115% U29, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 73.5 1-Core 202 2-Core 366 112% 214 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,093 102% 847 Pts	64-Core 1,545 96% 1,545 Pts
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 120%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop) 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 207% Clevo(1558 3702) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	229% Outstanding	Lighting 322 Reflection 360 Parallax 404 262% 362 fps	MRender 474 Gravity 300 Splatting 221 258% 332 fps
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 244%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 648GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7801Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2532 1969 1980 1965 1978 2015 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	391% Outstanding	Read 2,882 Write 3,147 Mixed 2,937 SusWrite 2,073 622% 2,760 MB/s	4K Read 75.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 93 293% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,553 DQ Write 1,049 DQ Mixed 1271 957% 1291 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 391% Great: 444%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB 3,483 User benchmarks, average bench 391% 361GB free Firmware: GXB7601Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1226 1954 1975 1981 1968 1979 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	404% Outstanding	Read 2,915 Write 3,402 Mixed 3,115 SusWrite 1,847 636% 2,820 MB/s	4K Read 83 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 109 366% 127 MB/s	DQ Read 1,641 DQ Write 1108 DQ Mixed 1,319 1,000% 1,356 MB/s
Poor: 225% ↑ This bench: 404% Great: 508%
SHGP31-2000GM 2TB 2,208 User benchmarks, average bench 335% 162GB free Firmware: 31060C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1716 1350 1383 1417 1340 1341 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	370% Outstanding	Read 2,894 Write 2,628 Mixed 1,711 SusWrite 1,425 484% 2,165 MB/s	4K Read 68.3 4K Write 199 4K Mixed 99.7 337% 122 MB/s	DQ Read 1,656 DQ Write 1,142 DQ Mixed 1,294 995% 1,364 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 370% Great: 446%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x31.5GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	MC Read 60.3 MC Write 64.1 MC Mixed 57.7 173% 60.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 47.4 SC Mixed 29.7 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 170%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 56: 0P 5R 9G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
25%	26%	42	215	57	144	17.2"	1280 720	BOE0BB7

History: Score 25: 0P 0R 7G 4B | Score 59: 0P 5R 9G 7B | Score 56: 0P 5R 9G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GTS73 N9X9U14 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 232%

UFO

Desktop 116%

UFO

Workstation 281%

UFO

System: Hansung GTS73 N9X9U14

CPU
Core i9-13900HXIntelBench 115%, 8,895 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 4090 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 207%, 3,538 samples	1x

SSD
MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TBSamsungBench 391%, 3,483 samples	1x

RAM
M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 153%, 54 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16