HP Zbook 17 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Zbook 17 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2255
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 13:58
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 152
58% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 245
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 280 243 211 183 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 426
Write 355
Mixed 222
SusWrite 235
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 32
116% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 143
146% 240 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
54GB free
Firmware: 0005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 101 126 134 123 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 91
Write 93.1
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 124
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 0" 1600 900
Typical Zbook 17 G2 Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Zbook 17 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback