HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 13:31
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 688
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.1% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 124
Parallax 74.5
74% 96.4 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 84.8
Splatting 77
63% 76.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 800
Write 698
Mixed 671
161% 723 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 49.1
160% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 714
548% 741 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 182%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 27" 1920 1009 NON0027 EM27144C
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback