Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 28 days ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 13:15
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 82.8
42% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 383
36% 301 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 52.9
42% 54.1 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 58.4
Splatting 54.6
46% 57 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 139 128 114 119 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 158
Write 119
Mixed 126
SusWrite 125
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 19.5
63% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 33.4
27% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 116%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 37 37 64 82 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 97.7
Write 104
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 53.5
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
321GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 145 137 143 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 143
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 27" 1920 1017 IVM6682 PL2766H
Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback