Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Galaxy A68M BATTLE GENERAL (all builds)
Motherboard	GALAXY A68M BATTLE GENERAL
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 09 '24 at 13:04
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6G 2,203 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 90.9 44% 70 Pts	4-Core 92 8-Core 91.9 12% 91.9 Pts	64-Core 92.2 6% 92.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 1E60) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 10.4 5% 7.83 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 8.9 Splatting 6.2 5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 128GB 439 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: RY26V0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 403 Write 301 Mixed 297 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 10.5 76% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 18.3 46% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 85%
Mass Storage Device 258GB 158GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 16.7 Write 17 Mixed 17 22% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 4.7 341% 4.73 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Ramsta-1600Mhz-4G 1x4GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	6	75	0.7"	1280 720	STD2022

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16