Lenovo 83A2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83A2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 12:45
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 172
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 410
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 12.7
9% 12.5 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 12.4
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt256g LS KIOXIA 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0108ANLS
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,873
Write 1,639
Mixed 1,239
352% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.9
206% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 994
714% 922 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44CB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE09C1
Typical 83A2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback