Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$20 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 29.5 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 130 40% 75.7 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 248 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 3.9 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB 3,411 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 37 36 41 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Write 48.9 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 36.8 12% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 6.7 18% 8.03 MB/s	DQ Read 64.5 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 19.5 20% 34 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 1x4GB 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.7 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 322 12% 322 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	6%	62	30	23	60	21.5"	1920 1017	BNQ78DB BenQ GW2270

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16