HP Z2 Mini G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
30 days ago, 30 days ago.
SystemHP Z2 Mini G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8458
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 07:23
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 119
2-Core 242
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 676
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 8458) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 19
Parallax 17.9
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.5
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,792
Write 1,496
Mixed 778
300% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 60.8
198% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 896
663% 879 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 39.7" 1280 720 HPN3742 HP Z40c G3
Typical Z2 Mini G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Z2 Mini G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback