Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 335%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 402%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics311% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 03:01
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 184
2-Core 362
114% 213 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,352
122% 1,027 Pts
64-Core 2,944
182% 2,944 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 88BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Lighting 478
Reflection 436
Parallax 511
390% 475 fps
MRender 561
Gravity 371
Splatting 268
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 311%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2674 2151 1958 1966 1943 1988 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,684
Write 3,004
Mixed 2,860
SusWrite 2,113
602% 2,665 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 82.3
261% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 989
DQ Mixed 1204
893% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 370%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2749 2716 2886 2466 1676 1668 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 2,557
Write 2,954
Mixed 2,810
SusWrite 2,360
604% 2,670 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 79.8
253% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,443
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 1,307
985% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 385%
Great: 526%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
668GB free
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 393 362 403 378 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 428
Mixed 394
SusWrite 396
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 46.9
152% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 130
121% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
840GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 414 433 448 444 451 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 444
Mixed 445
SusWrite 441
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 52.6
170% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
163% 219 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
844GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 414 433 449 444 447 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 446
Mixed 447
SusWrite 440
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 52.5
170% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 217
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
953GB free
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 399 367 404 401 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 427
Mixed 377
SusWrite 403
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 46.7
150% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 129
120% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 69.7
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 42.6
146% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 39.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 134%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback