MSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E24
MotherboardMSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 02:08
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 198
2-Core 391
121% 228 Pts
4-Core 756
8-Core 1,444
131% 1,100 Pts
64-Core 1,789
111% 1,789 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-GRE
Sapphire(1DA2 475E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 348
Parallax 624
245% 424 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 276
Splatting 361
270% 327 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 223%
Great: 228%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,999
Write 4,107
Mixed 3072
831% 3,726 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 73.1
235% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,569
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 1,322
968% 1281 MB/s
Poor: 291% Great: 626%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
47GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 211
Write 33.4
Mixed 10.2
70% 85 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
182% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD5EU016G-6400LA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
206% Outstanding
MC Read 80
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 78.7
214% 74.8 GB/s
SC Read 64.7
SC Write 70
SC Mixed 62.9
188% 65.9 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 206%
Great: 214%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78A7 BenQ GL2450H
Typical B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24) Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650M GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback