HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8105
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 00:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 532
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
EVGA(3842 2062) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 107
Parallax 108
91% 109 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 92
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 73 85 72 73 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 472
Write 357
Mixed 326
SusWrite 103
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 32.5
131% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 193
170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR648-PSB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Typical ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback