Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 00:04
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 34.2
1-Core 96
2-Core 127
48% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 218
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Dell(1028 08B0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 10.7
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZPZ512G NVM 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10400106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 73 219 111 75 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 733
Write 483
Mixed 497
SusWrite 157
104% 468 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 26.6
68% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 155
124% 173 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 122 24 60 13.4" 1280 720 SHP14AF
Typical XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback