Mm-vision TUF-GAMING-Z790-PLUS-WIFI-10DE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 483%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 641%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 132%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics384% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive450% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMm-vision TUF-GAMING-Z790-PLUS-WIFI-10DE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 234
2-Core 473
136% 265 Pts
4-Core 943
8-Core 1,822
164% 1,382 Pts
64-Core 4,320
267% 4,320 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Asus(1043 88E6) ≥ 4GB; RTX-4900 TUF Gaming
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
384% Outstanding
Lighting 631
Reflection 557
Parallax 738
514% 642 fps
MRender 503
Gravity 540
Splatting 259
337% 434 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 384%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRDK2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3614 2795 1863 2961 1844 2122 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
450% Outstanding
Read 2,594
Write 4,104
Mixed 3002
SusWrite 2,533
693% 3,058 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 118
369% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1857
DQ Write 1,553
DQ Mixed 1,777
1,312% 1,729 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 450%
Great: 649%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 81.6
MC Write 78.9
MC Mixed 75.6
225% 78.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 53
SC Mixed 35.4
107% 37.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 199%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 32 165 34.1" 1280 720 SAM711A LC34G55T
Typical TUF-GAMING-Z790-PLUS-WIFI-10DE Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 350%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 415%
UFO

System: Mm-vision TUF-GAMING-Z790-PLUS-WIFI-10DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback