XG 1544336

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemXG 1544336  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A520M-K
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 20:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 732
77% 616 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 90
84% 92.3 fps
MRender 83.7
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 64.4
59% 73.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 107 100 87 112 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 2,109
Write 350
Mixed 513
SusWrite 133
167% 776 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 20.7
125% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 270
282% 475 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 154%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 14.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 2R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 19% 32 206 55 75 21.5" 1920 1009 WAM2200 XG22VA
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback