Dell Precision 3581

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 3581  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 01K08D
Memory50.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 20:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 42.1
1-Core 206
2-Core 402
106% 217 Pts
4-Core 732
8-Core 1,205
118% 968 Pts
64-Core 1,848
114% 1,848 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0C07) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 31.2
22% 30.3 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 24.4
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9C1a Samsung 1024GB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57330409 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1052
Write 1,624
Mixed 1177
289% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 71.2
244% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 856
579% 714 MB/s
Poor: 205% Great: 416%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG88AGBSA092N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (81st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 70.1
MC Write 67.1
MC Mixed 64.5
192% 67.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 28.5
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 165%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE093E
Typical Precision 3581 Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Dell Precision 3581

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback