Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 174
2-Core 339
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 938
98% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4150 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 129
Parallax 131
114% 133 fps
MRender 153
Gravity 110
Splatting 95.8
95% 119 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,175
Write 7,867
Mixed 6,806
1,561% 6,949 MB/s
4K Read 572
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 308
1,406% 385 MB/s
DQ Read 1,520
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,120
884% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
463GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 428 434 428 426 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 421
Mixed 316
SusWrite 429
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 39.4
138% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 164
125% 167 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 107%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
289GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 216 83 84 81 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 486
Write 435
Mixed 400
SusWrite 166
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 45.7
157% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 211
159% 213 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 121%
WDC WD8001FZBX-00ASYA0 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 234 243 236 231 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 214
Write 199
Mixed 96.4
SusWrite 234
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1.3
9% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 4.4
4% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 162 163 165 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 94.1
Write 73.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 161
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
331% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 29.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 29.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 120 42.5" 1280 720 AUS43E1 ASUS XG438
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback