MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 17:49
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 274
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 695
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
MSI(1462 132E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 54.6
51% 60.6 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 51.1
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 984
Write 934
Mixed 792
201% 903 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 59.1
152% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 84
74% 114 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 203%
Lexar NQ100 960GB
777GB free
Firmware: SN11873
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 402 417 421 423 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 420
Write 451
Mixed 401
SusWrite 421
96% 423 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 30.3
104% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 212
164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 16.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 23% 75 535 455 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0957
Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback