Asrock H77M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 17:29
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 173
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 346
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 82.9
44% 64.6 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 61
Splatting 42.9
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 138 148 151 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 466
Write 155
Mixed 181
SusWrite 148
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 20.4
96% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 173
148% 223 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
6GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 60 59 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 56.7
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 59.7
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST4000VX016-3CV104 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 28.6
Mixed 31.6
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
1,542% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BD160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 54.6" 1920 1080 SAM7245 SAMSUNG
Typical H77M Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback