MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 604
58% 481 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2409) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 133
Parallax 269
113% 180 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 147
Splatting 207
160% 195 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 488 462 252 305 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 772
Write 179
Mixed 557
SusWrite 329
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 50.4
159% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 649
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 333
258% 368 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 118%
Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.8" 1280 720 LEN66BC L24e-30
Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $484
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback