Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 14:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 614
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 177
Parallax 164
127% 166 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 168
Splatting 119
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 386 412 413 401 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 433
Mixed 417
SusWrite 401
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 45.9
143% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 250
186% 248 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 2R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 48% 27 217 59 144 24" 1280 720 AUS24A3 MG248
Typical GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback