Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 13:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$159
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 186
2-Core 375
111% 214 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 355
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 122
Parallax 129
112% 130 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 106
Splatting 92.3
91% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 1TB
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,707
Write 3,888
Mixed 2,846
777% 3,480 MB/s
4K Read 84.1
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 110
411% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 1,866
DQ Write 1,446
DQ Mixed 1,666
1,244% 1,659 MB/s
Poor: 280% Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 33.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 194 13 60 27" 2560 1417 HWP326B HP E272q
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback