MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 13:01
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 794
83% 665 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 212
Parallax 205
188% 216 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 159
Splatting 130
141% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA004R22
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 393
Mixed 354
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 34.2
128% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 218
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB
560GB free
Firmware: VB411D62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1317 1375 1400 1401 1399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 1,390
Mixed 1,357
SusWrite 1,369
358% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.8
241% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,213
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 1,311
897% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 296%
Great: 330%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
50GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 137 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 94.6
Write 85.6
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 138
72% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34E2M
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback