Pcspecialist NP5x_60_7x_RNx1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
29 days ago, 29 days ago.
SystemPcspecialist NP5x_60_7x_RNx1  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NP5x_60_7x_RNx1
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 11:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 62.4
1-Core 194
2-Core 388
109% 215 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,123
106% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,456
90% 1,456 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A572) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 155
Parallax 137
122% 147 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 114
Splatting 94.7
109% 139 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$322
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 2,987
Mixed 3,159
498% 2,159 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 116
343% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1,129
898% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 315% Great: 616%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$322
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,975
Write 2,133
Mixed 2,221
473% 2,110 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 52.5
265% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,528
DQ Write 1,244
DQ Mixed 1,310
1,002% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 315% Great: 616%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK32S432G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 29
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 24.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0A13
Typical NP5x_60_7x_RNx1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist NP5x_60_7x_RNx1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback