Lenovo 81VU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81VU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 11:34
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 24.3
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 104
34% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 170
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 158 168 171 168 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,170
Write 397
Mixed 655
SusWrite 174
132% 599 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 46.6
152% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 223
173% 239 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 116%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 281
14% 281 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 28 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE075A
Typical 81VU Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81VU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback