Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504VA
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 11:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i3-1315U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 51.1
1-Core 174
2-Core 332
94% 186 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 764
82% 655 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 287D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 16.3
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 15.1
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1292 1378 1112 915 454 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,138
Write 1578
Mixed 1,108
SusWrite 884
266% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 62
222% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 561
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 502
354% 455 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 187%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 18 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO05A7
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback