MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D78
MotherboardMSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 07:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 206
2-Core 403
119% 230 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,296
125% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 1,902
118% 1,902 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 475C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 255
Parallax 417
178% 297 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 244
Splatting 254
202% 246 fps
Poor: 118%
This bench: 169%
Great: 178%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3337 3428 3465 3375 3467 3292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 1,897
Write 3,603
Mixed 2,352
SusWrite 3,394
640% 2,811 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65.4
218% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,835
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 1641
1,142% 1450 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 411%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
146% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 50.7
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 48
SC Write 66.7
SC Mixed 53.9
161% 56.2 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 146%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 16% 19 213 58 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C0A LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78) Builds (Compare 533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback