Pcspecialist Ultra 711

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 475%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 632%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics382% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive435% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 29 days ago.
SystemPcspecialist Ultra 711  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z790-P
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 06:40
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$505
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 235
2-Core 474
135% 264 Pts
4-Core 950
8-Core 1,785
163% 1,367 Pts
64-Core 4344
269% 4344 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
382% Outstanding
Lighting 612
Reflection 556
Parallax 754
499% 641 fps
MRender 518
Gravity 557
Splatting 298
358% 458 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 382%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKKW020X7 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3166 3043 1700 1593 1579 1591 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
435% Outstanding
Read 4,812
Write 3,276
Mixed 2,697
SusWrite 2,112
718% 3,224 MB/s
4K Read 78.7
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 83.8
267% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 451
389% 602 MB/s
Poor: 307%
This bench: 435%
Great: 648%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
689GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 344
Mixed 184
76% 344 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 23.8
79% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 30.1
72% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 499
Mixed 483
111% 495 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 24.8
86% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 223
162% 211 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion HDD 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.7
Write 106
Mixed 62.7
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 68%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 115
Mixed 77.5
131% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.5
221% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 65%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB
2TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 73.4
Write 72.3
Mixed 71.4
93% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
193% Outstanding
MC Read 82.4
MC Write 74.2
MC Mixed 72.7
218% 76.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 32.5
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 160%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2SG4
Typical Ultra 711 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 461%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Ultra 711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $2,261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback