Asrock B365M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 03:34
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 85.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 1067
96% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 87.7
54% 71.8 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 45.7
47% 59.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
642GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 429 422 405 419 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 442
Write 423
Mixed 400
SusWrite 420
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 27.1
88% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 349
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 133%
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$126
121GB free
Firmware: 121P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 561 231 403 120 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 808
Write 548
Mixed 597
SusWrite 331
127% 571 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 28.8
109% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 414
332% 464 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 108%
Great: 140%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
277GB free
Firmware: 11110101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 986 996 990 990 991 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,672
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,506
SusWrite 1,036
324% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 38.6
128% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,475
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 1,234
931% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 226%
Great: 278%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 125 128 126 128 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 122
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2J1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 29
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 27.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7000 C32R50x
Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback