Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel B250
Memory8.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 03:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 661
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3701 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 110
Parallax 115
98% 115 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 82.2
83% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0203A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 387 394 404 402 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 381
Mixed 368
SusWrite 379
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 18.7
104% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 29.4
73% 145 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 96%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 120
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 60 27" 1920 1017 XEC2380 ES-27X3
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback