Asus EX-H110M-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-H110M-V  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 01:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 188
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 185
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 117 13 8.3 87 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 468
Write 293
Mixed 330
SusWrite 43.4
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 24.1
113% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 68.1
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 39.9
65% 120 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
731GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 153 169 172 170 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 159
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 165
92% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-4GIS Kingmax GLAF62F-D8---------- 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 13 60 19.4" 1280 720 ACI20C1 ASUS VS207
Typical EX-H110M-V Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H110M-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback