MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 21:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 277
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 826
84% 679 Pts
64-Core 1065
66% 1065 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 76.7
62% 77.1 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 552 658 517 213 220 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1310
Write 798
Mixed 876
SusWrite 397
188% 845 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 74.3
263% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 474
433% 666 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 192%
Great: 172%
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
256GB free
Firmware: SBFMLA.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 452 125 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 264
Mixed 335
SusWrite 209
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 42.2
161% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 189
162% 235 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 38.2
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 38.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIC111 PANASONIC-TV
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback