Lenovo 21ED0059HH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 21ED0059HH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21ED0059HH
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231116
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 19:28
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 65
2-Core 108
44% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 383
34% 287 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50B1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.74% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 15.8
6% 12.1 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 13
Splatting 15.4
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-512G-1001 512GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 786 798 848 871 872 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 910
Mixed 900
SusWrite 830
210% 937 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 33.2
121% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 454
357% 487 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 155%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Micron MT40A1G16RC-062E:B 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.7" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback